葡萄酒中风味组分不同定量分析方法的对比研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparative Research of Different Methods for Quantitative Analysis of Flavor Components in Wine
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本文研究对比了减压蒸馏-GC,活性炭吸附-GC,以及顶空-GC三种方法定量分析测定葡萄酒中具体风味组分的优缺点。实验结果表明活性炭吸附-GC法适合测定葡萄酒中的乙醛和正丁醇;减压蒸馏-GC和活性炭吸附-GC法利于分析测定葡萄酒中正丙醇、异戊醇;顶空-GC法测定乙酸乙酯、乳酸乙酯和甲醇,简单快捷;减压蒸馏-GC定量检测乙酸较为准确;甘油更适合活性炭吸附法;而异丁醇由于沸点、黏度适中,三种方法均可以采用。这些分析结果对葡萄酒中风味物质的分析工作有一定的借鉴性。

    Abstract:

    The advantages and disadvantages of three kinds of methods such as vacuum distillation-GC, activated carbon adsorption-GC, and HS-GC for quantitative analysis of flavor components in wine were compared in this paper. The experimental results have shown that activated carbon adsorption-GC is proper for detecting acetaldehyde and n-butyl alcohol in wine; vacuum distillation-GC, activated carbon adsorption-GC analysis are fit for measuring n-propyl alcohol and isoamyl alcohol. Besides, it is simple and convenient for analyzing acetic ether, ethyl lactate and methanol by HS-GC. Furthermore, acetic acid and glycerine are suitable for vacuum distillation-GC and activated carbon adsorption-GC analysis, respectively. Due to its moderate boiling point and viscosity, isobutanol can be measured by all three methods. The above conclusions can supply a good reference for later analytical work for flavor components in wine.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郭亚红,金凯洪,张晶,李雪茹,樊文玲,李磊.葡萄酒中风味组分不同定量分析方法的对比研究[J].精细化工,2010,27(11):

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-07-05
  • 最后修改日期:2010-08-23
  • 录用日期:2010-09-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2010-10-18
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码